The Square Root of

[" i. "]

This ... is not being facetious or Freudian.  But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*




BTW:  NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive








Co-wink Key-dink ?  D'oh!




(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)

1.  the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2.  Chesterton on importance of fables
3.  ditto
4.  semantic (bs)/bs
5.  Mobius
Notational  Segway [!] *



*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you

P'P' la Pew

Polls a part. Weak ends w/ Alex Wit[!]


Not to dis-alex[!]




FN[!]: Wittgenstein , Obtusity? (sc)
fn2: Relative Exceptionalism !




Place* Holder?


* a powerful 5+ minutes
irony


[While the Witt link is yet to be located, it had to do with the Pew poll on popularity vis a vis France and America or of people for each other, their country and their leaders vis a vis Obama/branches/roots/congress.]







vis a vis a vie?  (Obama popularity 6 times that of Congress due to these visa vies.)

Low4est

As opposed to Hi8us or A3?

a1.  My roots are Scandinavian, French, 'n French-Canadian.
a2.  I won't get into my branches or algorithms.
b4. I tan gent or share 'n angle, my primary school was Sherwood Forest. 
c4. Presage of King County.
Sea 1st link.

The missing link?
[The spin* or ge oh me tricks of logos. {re-image} Politics, Economics, Hume...or us.]

* link added 4-13-14 (de-image) #- / -[!]
[4-14-14: ?   Objective Good ? ! ]
[Hume or ...  ?]
4-15-14 [Hume or?]

Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?

(1864-1917) Humanism, How is "exactness" possible*?
(1775-1854) Transcendental Idealism
Newtonian venn?**

* I will do little more than indicate Schopenhauer's relation to Hegel under Runes, let alone Schlick.(The Construction of Theories)
** Hobbes Squaring the Circle pre-Newton/Liebniz.

Ribble? re: nacre?
Hint?

12-27-13 Hobbes (b.s.)^  and Schlick(wiki) links inserted.

^ A(2) ? genre fishing ? ! ?

Pre-Mod L? (1588-1679)(1642-1727)(1646-1716)  So there was some overlap. Hobbes was mocked for trying to square the circle pre-calculus or pre-hyperbolic geometry. ? ! (lost roots ! ? [a, b, c ] ) (spoiler alert => OW do not scroll)

FOOTNOTE THREE (1-3-13)

JAN 2012 FOOTNOTE PAGE THREE

1-3-13 "me me" =(b.s.) or blog search scroll over
1-14-13 nor read or go all [!]
1-16-13 Loveland (NPR) and Colorado/Phoeniz-Sedona

Until I update some techno roots I am limited to photos already in my blogspot files.

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the News Stand

Before I entered Half-Priced Books***, I told myself I would not pick up anything on a whim, or rather only if it had some extra-ordinary significance.(loosely paraphrasing.)* And what do I find right on top of the bargain rack at the door? The mother of all bargains. It was a pristine copy of a very interesting book for only two dollars. It's title, The Demon Slayers and other stories: Bengali Folk Tales.

It was not till I got home that I found even more about the book. Not only was it a first edition, it was autographed by both authors. Just what is the significance beyond the luck of such a find? Well in a Pop Culture, it is related to the mother of all cultures. Not history or her story but our story.

* in my last visit I found a new edition of Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith

(mean while under Division of Labor I find the roots of an evolutionary social process)

BTW: From Tale Gate to Retro Gate [!]

And other follow-up: Go Rick Go! or Read my lips [!]

(sic)[?], puke, water-bored?, parsing?, snob... Rollin' on the River**

** pun on Ed*** in (sic) Rollins 'n F'n d-now.

** Ed Rollins, not that all "F" are ineffable or pro-feign.(alternate asterisk)

*** to pass through to the news stand in the mall

Now this is the ticket.

Or rather perspective on having a perspective.

1. Professor Ponzi, or thinking about the methodology, the sociology and the economics of economics

2. Sylvia Nasar on The Story of Economic Genius: Great Thinkers in History

New Page: Institute for New Economic Thinking

Also: Progressive Media

Also Updates: Gingrich/Romney on Pop e Culture.*

Such** a deal?

*the links are still evolving, I saw an impressive Romney speech***, but only in the light of Gingrich and Santorum.

** Thom Hartmann roots out biology and an abstraction as corner stone to society, before guestflees. (and that is a note on the light R side)

[BTW: these are living asterisks in their anachronism C*** BTW2.0 He opens with a spin on the joke on Bush. GW gave us progressives. To paraphrase: Obama community organized CPAC.]

*** also C***under-BTW: Pop Culture & yogurt or Yo!Gurt

under **see-not necessarily a huff

[On the Economy, and mythbusters?]

[2-23-12 The Dickens, you say? Label and Image added.]

Flow of Conscience

Not Exactly Either,
nor Out of the Box.
Speaking of Supply and Demand
or trickle down and bubble up.
No Dead C Scroll over, nor out.

Just a hint that things are not black and white,
nor up without down, let alone level or limited.
The original trigger was a conversation at a holiday party,
which I wished to amend here,
while John Dean and William James[***] were part of the head water or ledership.

[Speaking of flow, and roots or branches.]

[See Three Comments]
[Seg Way: E pit o'me[!]
/ I will now slightly edit a bit of above,
without adding any links as after thoughts unless noted.(see italics)]

[For the scroll-over challenged*, I will list the links in order...
(under construction I through XIX)
I Sciousness, wiki.
II Pandora, wiki.
III Theodicy, wiki.
IV Supply, blog search
V Demand, ibid.
VI slippery slope, ibid.
VII Power Broker, ibid.
VIII scroll, ibid.
IX ibid.,ibid[?]
X "Conservatives without Conscience"
XI "The Liberal Conscience"
XII Try-Unism
XIII google find "liberal conscience Dean"/Howard
XIV ibid. /Baker
XV "X & Y Chromo Somes", my blog
XVI "Image of Original In Tent", ibid.
XVII December 2011 archives, ibid.
XVIII "A PEAS Meant", ibid.
XIX "Post Script", ibid.
SEGUE:
Seg Elizabeth Warren replies to Karl Rove
Way Her way (video).
Epitome
[!] Sat Ire
A bit frayed at the edges.

*or to save you a trip

[See Comments up to the sixth, then I was Roving my web pages and found this. Speaking of Prophetic Tributes. Innocence bUy...to the good fight.]
[Speaking of frayed.**]

** see Seg Way source LA Times.
[***] 12-13-11 Correction to James(not Blake)

Marco...

Polo
Time Machine?
Marco Rubio.

A bit of an astroturf here, not the grass* roots:

Several times during his race for U.S. Senate, Rubio told reporters and voters his parents left Cuba in 1959, suggesting they had fled Castro's rule. In his campaign biography, and later in his official Senate biography, he said his parents "came to America following Fidel Castro's takeover."

It turns out that: "Instead of fleeing Castro's Cuba, the Rubios came to the United States for "economic opportunity," Conant said."
* next

Bleep 'n Compromise (Dept Ceiling) Review**

Not to be prophetic, but "I told you so."

In particular in The Jig is Up? and Bleep 'n Compromise,
but more importantly under Respected Sources.

IMHO: Randi Rhodes and Lawrence O'Donnell are radio and TV's number one(respectively) explainers* of the Obama Administration. Here are two Debt Ceiling recaps from Randi Rhodes which are nothing compared to hearing her.(AM 1090 Forum )

*respectfully
** which is not the same as bleepin'
(See Bleep & Compromise)

[Related Links and Nets or Roots & branches.]
[I wish I could unembed a little more plain language from this post, but maybe a counter example might do. With a do nothing congress***, the best thing to do is to kick the can down the road for political purposes.

*** or more accurately an undo-everything-House
edited (bold and spacing only)

[On the other hand: No Labels(slash)New Party
More musing: architect, archetype / archespectral, archiflightese]
[Speaking of hooks or hoofs? Read Herring?]


John Deering

Slash Segue

Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate
And Criss-Classification
It is not about right or left but who* is the behind.

*please excuse the just(juxt)aposition of humor

---

For Sagans Sake: I will ungoogle the B. or link con tent:
(i.e. list of links above)
TED: Sandel as noted
Sandel/Soros
BookTV: Hedges on Class
New Yorker: Taleb
Jim Wallis(Sojourners) Sandel
BBC:Sit com? (no pun but Latin roots**)
Taleb Context
*
Asimov context
Mike Wallace: Ayn Rand
Embed(un) Pop Culture
Pre-Decartes or Aristotellian***?

**actual roots are(not) the spin on "darkest before the storm"

*** not to mention the B&A tangents not relinkeds(sp!)
[2-17-11 UPDATE:(not) Talk about a fifth sense? Yikes.]

Now Dat's...

what I am talkin' 'bout.
And I had not even found the latter link before I had this line. But the former link needs updating and post dating.

Here it is:

Tuesday, January 04, 2011
Post Inserted Rough ramble old style.(pen and paper)

NO LABEL (constitutionalist)
Dragnet: names are changed (no association)
Bubble Up(Still) Party
No Champagne, but trickledown of whine.
Private Corps./Adam Smith
History / Our foundation.
Guilt by association, innocent by No.
Social Darwinist[Fundamental wordist}
Free Association, Not a Force.
Free Willie? So who(said)dat?
Play the cards, dealer.

Post-Sub Title: Buddie to remain nameless,
can you (S)paradigm and Party Less.

[The above will stand alone, substantially as originated and linkless so to speak, and for others to Google or search(of blog) themselves.]

NOW FOR THE FOOTNOTES: Who Dat? Chuck Knox. The Saints were no cards but the Seahawks are no joke! Now I will not try to trace back the rest of my ramble, but it is what I had in mind. But I will make a further association. The party to remain nameless, was asked for a label for himself(Constitutionalist). While others may be Tea Party Republicans or Libertarian Free Marketeers, to label or not to label that is the question. Whether is is nobler in the minds... Regardless we can associate 3rd partiers that may or may not associate with a party as having common strains* if not roots.

Note: changed "changes" to changed in ref. to Dragnet line.

BTW: whatever happened to the Gatorade for Carrol? I guess that is for college. But it seams a crack at the changes or no whine team. But in regards to the whine, I know parties that did not think a losing teams should go to the playoffs, but it is the way the rules were made. It is the process that matters whether you like it or not. Results of course matter, but you can't always change them.

*strains: on another thread elsewhere

Tact and Tack

Keep the Change! This is a pin the tail on the rhetoric(of sorts). As Palin said we "can keep the change". Economically, that means they will have to pay something. Tact is another matter. (It is not we or you or they or us.) In this regard some follow-up is warranted. We can agree that America is an exceptional place, but it is still a concern about what exceptionalism means. In this I mean to point to the French connection between a Slate comment(one Geir Smith) and a historical reference. Further tact(& tack) is required...
[But to be blunt the word is Heritage that explains our nation, and we are free to acknowledge our roots in the words we choose, and it can always be taken wrong by some,] i.e. we say anyone is a "fill in blank"-American but it does not mean anyone has two birth places (requiring hyphe-nation is no better than dropping one in a melting pot.)

Net Roots or Grass Tip Memo

We are not alone in thinking we have the solutions, but sometimes it takes enough information and expertise to get things done, let alone right. Frustration and fiat are not enough! And often the media serves both rather than fact. In fact, given the relationship between the media and some of the culprits, and an often said reliance on them for information, there is only more information that needs to be filtered or weeded out[**]. This applies to fixing the economic bubble in the stratosphere and the bathyspheric leak* in the our planet. Excuses are lame, but solutions might be unprecedented.
[update: two comments and reining link.]

*only a geographic reference(link) to the President's Press Conference
[**] it took me a while to catch this pun See Update Under Construction.

Hierarchy of Hypocrisy

Hating to generalize I note my potential logical fallacy in the following. Nevertheless, between the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment, there seems a hierarchy for some. From Right to Bear Arms to Citizenship Rights where does the 1st amendment fit in? (*)

A. There is no hierarchy in constitutional amendments.
B. There are Supreme Court rulings that influence their dynamics.
C. So many blogs are moot points. (GOTO 1st sentence)

Of course maybe my posts are just moot or problematic. Problematic in generalizing and leaping. Unfortunately you must read, to decide. In generalizing there may be some association between the authors of certain events but not necessarily relevant. In the above case I simply point to fact that removal of citizenship is being considered for some but not their guns, while free speech is an element that might be fringe but relative. Meanwhile in an earlier and adjacent thought, some of this new found legislative fury seem like WMD.** Weapons of Mass Distraction. It would seem that all this populist rancor is really keeping Homeland Securiy busy. And while I support all rights reasonably used, I cannot help but feel that it really is a burden on our security. A bit more responsible reporting and responsible associating might help, but then how one goes about that...almost makes me long for a unitary executive. BTW: the dot, dot, dot was a rhetorical segue or moot question.

My potential obtuseness was not an attempt to be excedingly careful***, yet the cause and effect might be anachronistic(i.e. flip-flopped). The links to previous word choices were not intentionally designed to be more than a search for my previous usage, but they do seem to bring up some previous associations which show the importance of the process and progress, not to mention providing hope.

(*) an alternative link.
(**) not that early: My first referencing of Weapon of Mass Distraction.
(***) but maybe an antidote to some talk show hosts that muddle the search for terrorist

[Oh, and I do not vouch for the legal analysis or terminology in my ABC's. And had not intended to close with the SCOTUS link when I set out. Let alone the less than inflammable association with security. But it does seem that it is wierd that flammable and moot have similar usage issues as does the roots or branches of Faust, let alone Devil's Advocates. But no, that is the legal process, not to mention political, and word and world modifying dynamics, or as I have stumbled out(or coined) "dymanics". I will conclude with the issue that there was some Beckian confusion in the topic of a National Prayer Day in regard to what was canceled and what is being fought and by whom. But the ideas which Thom Hartmann yesterday contrasted was a National Day of Reason to share and balance the National Day of Prayer. While I suggested a National Day of Faith. But would that be legal? Not without debate, moot and inflammable or not.]

Vast Mainstream Conspiracy (VMC)

= HYPE!
I was actually[***] on the way to another link when the imperfect nature of things took a tangent to the Montel Williams comment above (HYPE!).

Hype* was already[**] on my mind, as the nature of the beast. Media in general not The Daily Ones.

* see bracketed by Remembering posts
** see comment 1 Also see bold roots(links/cheer)

*** [Subliminal Root or Cheer and/or (ofor) Market Forces in balance and action?]

Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.

you google*
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)

[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]

It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. [**]
Steven Clemons: On Olbermann
Palin and the Pashtun and the Dickens it is.
Lawrence Wilkerson: on ibid. [6-22-12 Link Corrected]
A Christmas Carol meets A Wonderful Life.

Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.

footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]

[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.

[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]

1-9-14 Kant we all  ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches?  No.  Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics?  Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant.  Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics.  Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee.  (G'Ribble Label?)

All Politics is Local

Between the League,
and the Base ***
the ivy and the grass roots.[**]
Not to mention* between Lincoln, FDR and two Teddys.

* One should wonder if Lincoln could be elected as a Repulican, let alone how to carry a schtick.

[Puget Sound Liberals]
[Northwest Progress Institute]
[**] 11-13-09 Not to be con descending by noting the links, but I was speaking to the Base and the League in reading into it the problems that I try to work out in this blog. So please, speak up to power, and let's get down to business. An aside: Russ Baker needs a look, uppity or not.

*** this link is a hit

What are they smoking?

Grass Roots v. Grass Fires.
(Astroturf: the new carpetbaggers)
(Swifter(out from) under the rug, or wet blanket. Should we
fly the flag?)*
[Who inhaled? (Dylan or Donnie and Joe?)]
[Sweep Tea Partiers under the Astroturf with Swifter-(see coupons above)]

[Olbermann: Terrorist Panels and...
Psssst. THEY DRUG OLD PEOPLE.
Rachel Maddow and the party of nope & rope a dope.]

* Boycott FOX and wave at Walmart and P&G for their agreement.

Change Happens!

A New Kind of Pride Eugene Robinson Washington Post Even from my Norman* roots.

From a Rachel Maddowian perspective, I don't want to count my chickenhawks before they fly. But as you can tell by the time of this post the ground swell is a great feeling.

Maybe I won't call it till 1-20-09. Superstition being that as soon as a bet is placed the odds change. Actually that is a reality. Technically every vote should count. Statistically it takes us all. I don't know whatity,(or whatally) but it is rather late. The point is, I will not place a bet on the chance it jinxes or nixes our future.

[grab bag from my email]
[8:30 AM - Obama Elected President as Racial Barrier Falls Truthout.]
[I have to say the Republicans succesfully employed a strategy to get out the vote that I could not have implimented by myself. Make it tough to vote and the people will get it.]
[Looking forward from yesterday: Obama on Election Day. and last week regarding fears of one party rule.]

* Scandinavian, French, Mixed heritage